Want to be able to become such a Holmes VR robot can get agogoktv

Want to be able to have such a Holmes VR robot will be able to get [VR dimension] jury rarely allowed to visit the crime scene. Although there are exceptions, but it often involves more complex, very famous murder, for example, in 1995 the United States O J Simpson murder case, and in 2001 the British Gil Dando murder. However, it is often possible for jurors to get to know the truth in this way, which can lead to problems, such as the possibility of bias, and the jury’s presence at the scene of the crime can also pose logistical and security challenges. When the jury went to the scene of the crime, a group of five cars were used to transport the jurors, lawyers, judges and police officers. In the neighborhood, the reporters and others, they walked through the police barricades. The media have reported on the matter. But now, the rapid development of imaging technology, robot technology and AI are expected to avoid these troubles, they can sit in the court of the judge and the jury "teleport" to the scene of the crime. This approach can help the jury to assess the prosecution and the defense argument. For example, in 2007 the music producer Phil Spector murder trial, defense lawyers claimed that there is a large fountain scene, in which a witness misheard what Spector said. By visiting the scene, the jury can determine the possibility of such a large, in order to better understand the development of the case. When the jury personally visits the scene of the crime, the status of the site may have changed, unlike the state of the crime. For example, in the trial of the Simpson case, it was said that the scene was re decorated, the goods moved position. The longer the date of the trial, the greater the likelihood of a change in the scene. The court allowed forensic teams to produce visual evidence in court as an alternative to the jury’s own investigation into the scene of the crime. Forensic teams collect and use evidence to reconstruct the exact sequence of events that occur during the course of a crime. Photography and sketching are also part of the reconstruction process, which is still largely done by hand. When you look at the photos of the crime scene, you can see the picture is not complete, because they are subject to the limitations of the photographer’s vision and insight. Although the video can capture more scenes, but the vision is still relatively limited. Sketches can show the location and layout of the crime scene, which is not a photo and video. You can see the scene in the sketch and see the exact position and relative position of the evidence. But give a sketch is not true feeling, because they passed over the interpretation of the artist. Similarly, although the photos and video can be made of 3D computer animation, but they still have relatively strong subjective color, may even take some production methods to support the prosecution or defense opinions. Immersion evidence. However, new technologies are emerging, they can make the forensic capture and display more vivid, more representative of the crime scene images, these technologies include 3D images, panoramic camera, robot technology and VR. For example, a team of researchers at the Staffordshire University, led by Caroline, led by the use of green screen, electronic game software and the latest VR helmets (such as Ocul), the相关的主题文章: